More clients.The same reviewer.
Free your team from repetitive work. Compare a redesigned workflow, AI support and extra people before deciding how to grow.
Your AI operations partner. Improve your workflows, give the right tasks to people and AI agents, and keep getting better—with clear ownership and measurable results.

Your tasks, people and handoffs.
The right role for every task.
Test the result. Adapt each week.
Growing demand, repetitive work or AI that adds more checking. Start with the pressure you feel; find a better way to organise the work.
Free your team from repetitive work. Compare a redesigned workflow, AI support and extra people before deciding how to grow.
Put AI in the right steps, with clear human checks. Improve the whole workflow, including the work left with your team.
Simplify repeated tasks and hand suitable steps to AI agents. Compare the full cost while protecting service quality.
Verify the pack and resolve exceptions. A faster draft can still leave the same person doing more checking.
Check whether the change reduces effort without missing critical checks.
A useful change should stay useful. See how people and AI performed, catch work shifting back to your team, and agree what happens next.
The example team will use AI to prepare a draft from approved context. People keep source verification, exceptions and release approval.
Same workload. Less time spent on every case.
Include preparation, review, corrections and ongoing oversight. These are editable planning assumptions, not measured results or industry benchmarks.
If the released hours fit the delivery work in every role.
Time value = 22 hours × €60. It becomes cash savings only when a payment, such as overtime or contractor work, actually disappears. Service fees are excluded from this capacity illustration.
Additional client capacity uses the tightest role, with Delivery specialist: 6 hours per new client per month; Account lead: 2 hours per new client per month. Confirm delivery needs before accepting more clients. This time is not also counted as avoided spending.
Map the work. Design the people + AI workflow. Review the first test.
A weekly decision brief, follow-through and support for one priority workflow.
€2,700 in year one if continued for 12 months.
Month to month. Taxes and separately scoped work excluded.
Bring your work records. Get a view of the processes they cover, then choose one priority with a named owner.
Decide what stays human, what AI assists and what an agent can execute. Compare the full effort, cost and quality trade-offs.
Get a revised workflow with inputs, human owners, agent boundaries, approval rules and a small test. Agree tools and implementation before live use.
Review the result, catch new bottlenecks and agree the next action. Keep a stable process when it is still doing its job.
Your team owns business decisions and approves live use. Custom implementation, bespoke integrations and specialist consulting are separately scoped. Live execution is a target capability; the current prototype illustrates it with a simulation.
Yes. Workshaper connects the process map, task allocation, human approvals and test evidence in one place, then returns to the results each week. Its intended value is helping your team organise and improve human–AI work with less coordination effort.
Our first focus is founders and operations leaders in service companies with 10–50 people. Start with one repeatable workflow. The wider vision is a shared system for designing, coordinating and improving work across people and AI agents.
Initial connection and scope setup, a review of the available data, a baseline of effort and costs, options for change and the first review of expected benefits. The proposal is €500 for month one, then €200/month from month two. Taxes are excluded. No purchase starts in this prototype.
The proposed subscription covers one configured workflow: tracking the work and its costs, agreed automation with human decisions and exceptions, weekly review and standard product support. Custom implementations, new bespoke integrations and specialist consulting are separately scoped.
No. A short weekly check can confirm that a useful process is holding up. The weekly review checks workload, quality, exceptions and costs, then records a decision to keep, revise or pause.
Your team keeps responsibility for quality, staffing and consequential actions. The proposed assistant gathers context, executes agreed steps and routes exceptions. It does not take over the entire business or make hiring decisions for you.
Tracker connections use labelled demonstration data; CSV import uses your file. You can compare inputs, explore a simulated approval workflow, record test observations and save weekly reviews. Live integrations, AI execution, automatic monitoring, notifications and billing are not active.